The operating document for the Joust brand. How we sound, how we look, and how we show up across documents, decks, email, and the web.
Joust is a San Francisco technology practice. We pair 30-plus years of enterprise depth with the agility modern teams expect, across web engineering, AI automation, analytics, CMS migrations, and digital strategy.
We are a senior bench of operators and engineers, not a staffing model. Clients hire us when they want sharp thinking and clean execution from people who have seen the problem before. We have built solutions for Google, Meta, LinkedIn, PayPal, Affirm, MassMutual, Honda, Hyundai, Mazda, Kia, Toyota, BMW, Mitsubishi, Cummins, MeUndies, and TKRG, among others.
Technical clarity. For what's ahead.
Two words describe what we deliver. We do not hide expertise behind jargon, and we do not dilute strategy with vague reassurances. We bring sharp thinking to messy problems, and we explain our work so it is actually useful.
Decades of pattern recognition, applied with humility. The win is the client's, not ours.
Real answers beat impressive-sounding ones. We trade jargon for specifics.
Code is a means, not the goal. We solve business problems with the right technical decision, not the most clever one.
We push for the right work, not the most work. We say no to scope that does not move the needle.
For enterprise leaders who need a technology partner that understands both the engineering and the business, Joust delivers clear thinking, sharp execution, and the calm confidence that comes from having seen these problems before.
Joust sounds like a senior engineer who is also a great teacher. Comfortable with the technical detail. Comfortable explaining it. Never showing off.
The em dash rule.
Joust does not use em dashes or double hyphens anywhere. Use commas, periods, colons, or parentheses instead. This rule applies across every document, email, web page, deck, and deliverable. No exceptions.
A few rules govern how Joust talks about itself. They keep the pedigree honest and the message pointed at the client's problem, not our internal machinery.
Nobody has to read what Joust sends. Cold email, LinkedIn messages, the white-paper nurture motion, and the content calendar all live or die by whether the opening lines earn the next thirty seconds. A story people actually want to read does that. A claim about us does not.
Every message follows the same three-part shape: Hook, Bridge, Point.
Open with a short, true story about a person, company, or world the reader recognizes and admires. Fifty to one hundred words, tighter for cold email. Drop the reader into a scene like a movie cut. Include a recognizable name or an exciting concept in the first few words. Land a surprising claim backed up quickly. Close cleanly.
Every hook must be true and sourced. No invented stories, no apocryphal "business legends" (no NASA space pen, no Ford "faster horse"). Every entry in the hook bank carries a source link and a verification, the same discipline as the pricing research. If it cannot be verified, it does not ship.
One line that crosses from the story into the reader's world. For cold readers, bridge early. If the story runs long with no relevance, they leave.
One idea per message. State it first. Take a position. Write to one person: maximize you, minimize I. For email, close with a P.S. that restates the ask (skimmers read the P.S.). Keep it scannable: first line on its own, short sentences, one idea per paragraph.
"I have spent thirty years building enterprise technology. AI is the same movie, faster. Most companies bought the tools and the work never changed."
"In 1987 the economist Robert Solow looked at a decade of companies pouring money into computers and wrote the line that stuck: 'You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.' The tools were everywhere. The payoff wasn't. You're watching the AI version of that right now. The spend is real. The work didn't change. Worth 30 minutes?"
Source: Robert Solow, "We'd Better Watch Out," New York Times Book Review, July 12, 1987. Verified.
A running bank of true, sourced story hooks mapped to the pains lives in joust-hook-bank.md. Pull from it; never start cold. Add to it monthly. Mine biographies and business books, Reddit r/todayilearned sorted by top, Quora open-ended threads, Kindle popular highlights. Every entry earns its place with a source link and a verification.
We leverage best-in-class methodologies to deliver world-class digital transformation outcomes.
We rebuild the platform in stages so revenue keeps moving while the new system comes online.
Our lean, scrappy team brings agility to every engagement.
We are a small senior bench. The person scoping your work is the person doing it.
We are 85% confident this approach will yield strong ROI.
Based on the audit, this approach should pay back inside two quarters. Here is the math.
A single dominant purple, deepened with two darker accents and grounded in neutrals. The brand reads as confident, modern, and slightly editorial. Color is used as accent and emphasis, not as decoration.
The Joust wordmark is the primary brand signature. The lowercase setting and rounded letterforms read as approachable; the weight reads as confident. Do not redraw or substitute the typeface; the wordmark is custom.
1x clear space where 1x is roughly the cap height of the wordmark. More is better. Print minimum 0.75 inch wide; digital minimum 96 pixels wide.
Stark White is the default light surface. Charcoal and Deep Purple are both valid dark surfaces; Charcoal reads more editorial and neutral, Deep Purple reads warmer and more on-brand for cover and section divider treatments.
These values look close to brand colors at a glance but read wrong in practice. Do not use them in any Joust material.
A single typeface, used at scale. Poppins handles everything from cover treatments to body copy. Weight and size do the work of differentiation. No second typeface.
A soft diagonal sheen is the brand's one decorative element. A lighter wash sweeps from the upper-left toward the middle of the surface at roughly 135 degrees, giving covers, section dividers, and dark hero panels a sense of depth without ornament. The sheen reads as paper or material quality rather than as a graphic.
Diagrams follow the card system, not clip art. A diagram is a small set of labeled cards connected by arrows, and it should read like a page from a deck, not a piece of stock illustration.
Cards and diagram nodes cast one standard shadow: outer, Deep Purple #1E0722 at roughly 20 percent opacity, 12pt blur, 3pt offset, falling to the lower-right. Small elements such as icon circles use a softer variant, 6pt blur and 1.5pt offset. Shadows never appear on the wordmark or on type.
Joust headlines often resolve in two clauses. Lead with the noun phrase, then complete the thought with an accent phrase set in Purple Tint. The accent phrase carries the answer, the surprise, or the punchline.
Three sections, one argument.
Different shapes. Same answer.
Joust is a senior technology practice for what comes next.
Photography favors quiet confidence over hustle. Architectural lines, considered light, real environments. Avoid stock-photo composites and over-staged team shots.
One place to get the files. The wordmark downloads directly from this page. Larger source files live in Google Drive > Joust Brand Library. If a file is not in one of those two places, it is not an approved asset.
Three approved colorways, each previewed on the surface it is built for. Do not rebuild the wordmark from a font; it is custom. Take the SVG from here for web and code. The Brand Library holds the same three colorways as transparent PNG for decks and documents.
Logo files dated before October 2024 use the retired blue-violet mark. It circulates in two values, #7451F2 and #7551F1, so searching for only one will miss files. Do not use either. When you find one, move it to an Archive subfolder. The retired marks have already been removed from this website.
A tour of the brand in context. Each surface has a few rules; if a piece breaks them, it is off-brand even if every color is right.
Joust produces two kinds of documents. Internal docs live inside the team. Client-facing docs leave the building. They follow different rules so the team can move fast on internal work without sacrificing polish on the work that carries the brand.
| Internal | Client-facing | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience | Joust team and trusted contractors. | Clients, prospects, partners, vendors. |
| Tone | Direct, plain, fast. Shorthand and acronyms OK. | Plainspoken but polished. No internal shorthand. |
| Visual | Light brand: header line, footer line, body type. No cover. | Full brand: cover, eyebrows, sectioning, page numbers. |
| Typography | Poppins for headers, body in Poppins or system fallback. | Poppins required. Fallbacks per typography section. |
| Color | Black on white. Joust Purple for emphasis only. | Full primary palette. Plum subheads, Joust Purple accents. |
| Length | As short as possible. One screen if achievable. | As short as the work allows. No padding. |
| Approval | Author publishes when ready. | Lead reviewer signs off before send. |
| Filename | Joust_Internal_DocType_YYYYMMDD | Joust_ClientName_DocType_YYYYMMDD |
Internal docs are project notes, kickoff handoffs, retros, technical RFCs, working docs, sprint reviews, status updates to the team, and decision logs. The reader is a colleague who already has the context, so the doc earns its keep by being short and specific.
Client-facing docs are the surface the brand lives on. They include proposals, statements of work, kickoff materials, deliverable reports, audit findings, executive summaries, retainer briefs, and any deck shared outside Joust.
Internalize these and the brand stays consistent across every surface. Brand systems work because they are followed in the small moments, not the big ones.